You may have received the following emails:
Your channel was indexed in a rights-review summary that landed on our desk earlier today.
We maintain catalog-matching operations covering numerous partner catalogs. Throughout this week’s automated sweep, an enrolled sound asset turned up in a recent video on your channel. Reference AUD-375701 was established.
For now, the matter remains unfiled externally ; it lives in our database alone. Failing any confirmation before the response window concludes, the case advances automatically. Reduced reach for the video comes first, then a takedown request gets submitted.
Under normal circumstances a simple submission resolves the query: name the source of the audio : licensed footage packs, DAW presets, creator permissions, valid confirmation closes the ticket right away.
One form covers the entire process:
Make sure to enter your reference in the case reference field so we can attribute the source properly. If tapping the link has no effect, navigate directly to the URL shown above.
Sincerely : we prefer avoiding automated platform strikes,
Music Rights Administration
Just wanted to reach out to you personally – I handle content inquiries at CopyByteLLC. During a standard content check of your channel uploads, our team surfaced content packaging that uses misleading metadata practices.
You can verify the claim notes and check where this was flagged by opening the report here
The link enables direct online resolution so you can easily clarify this or resolve it before any formal steps take place. Please review the preview via the link in the shortest possible time so we can sign off on this ticket. Otherwise, the claim will move forward along formal channels without delay.
A catalog-match review was filed recently regarding your channel
We direct rights administration covering a set of major label catalogs. In this week’s automated sweep, a copyrighted audio asset appeared within a recent upload of yours. We track it under AUD-632187.
At this point the matter hasn’t left our desk: no external action is on record. Things move forward once the 48h timeframe comes to an end. Initially the upload faces distribution limitations; after which a strike filing goes out.
Usually a single quick response resolves the query: name the source of the track; documented permission closes the case on the spot.
One form covers the entire process:
Make sure to enter your reference @IzzyLaif directly on the page so we can attribute the source properly. Should clicking change nothing, navigate directly to the URL shown above.
Thank you — we would much rather settle this informally,
Catalog Clearance Office